Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - andrew

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 29
1
JMBarrie / E;lizabeth Smart's visit to JMB
« on: October 15, 2023, 05:23:48 PM »
Best known for her prose poem, “By Grand Central Station I sat down and wept“, Elizabeth Smart came from a wealthy Canadian family who visited England regularly. Elizabeth was 19 in 1933. Her favourite writers were D H Lawrence (she’d just finished “Lady Chatterley’s lover“ and declared it a work of genius), Katherine Mansfield, Virginia, Woolf – and J M  Barrie. She determined to meet Barrie when next in London, and managed to get a letter of introduction from a distinguished Canadian family friend, Bill Herridge. She wrote up her account of their meeting in her diary:

April 5 [1933]
I had nightmares all night that it would be after 12.30 when I woke up. Too late to go to Barrie! So I was up what I would call betimes though the sun was pouring in my window. I took a bath and put on my best clothes. I felt scared and elated by turns and inadequate and unspeachable by turns. Too late and too sudden - all unbeknownst and unprepared. …
I didn’t look very nice – still sleepy, and pale and hair too undisciplined - but O well – and I put on my new Worth coat and my hat – and left the flat in fear and elation – I thought I would walk a bit towards Hyde Park Corner to kill the time and wake me up.
The Sun was glorious. I hailed a taxi and gave the address.… We got to Adelphi Terrace and drove along it – but no Adelphi terrace House – we drove around the block – asked several people – and finally found it – just before you come to the terrace – on the corner going down. … In fear and trembling, I entered No 3. It looked a deserted place – a big bare stone or marble cold hall with firms’ names written up on the glass doors. I saw no flat names anyway, so I rang a bell that was labelled Housekeeper and asked which was James Barrie. She said “fourth floor“ in a very hardened voice – what was a mere  great man to the likes of her? And as there was no one to run the lift – which seemed automatic or self-lift – I avoided it and chose the stone stairs - up - up. And I was out of breath from fear and anticipation at the bottom, so I didn’t think I could bear the way my heart was dropping about to my tummy inside me – at the top. I saw a sturdy, small figure pass across inside – just a shadow through the translucent glass. I lay my music case down against the wall, took three breaths and with a trembling hand rang the bell.
A shortish-sturdy secretary, middle-aged but younger with an ordinary face, opened the door - and it opened right into a small, square room with windows. I said nothing, but raised my eyebrows in query, and he said “Miss Smart?“ And I said “Yes“ – feeling thankful towards him for helping me out. Then I didn’t feel scared, just apprehensive. The time has arrived but I was unprepared.
I followed the man into a big yellow room (on the right) whose windows look out over the Thames. It was beautifully used-looking and warm, with a big tall thing of used-looking and warm books on the left wall and a small old-fashioned piano of a yellowish colour in front of it – and it had all an air of books and papers and tobacco. Then the secretary announced me, and I shook hands with Barrie. He seemed to have small, stumpy hands, and for a minute I thought he was deformed – but No No. He had a big patch of iodine on his left cheek and he didn’t look as fragile as I expected him to. He was more the build of Ralph Strauss, but not so robust or cruel. He had those distinctive eyes small with pouches under them and they are sort of triangular because the flesh above them falls in a sort of tent. I think he had on a smoking coat.
On the right as I came in were books and non-descript things and a screen, and behind the screen was his big desk – and behind that an alcove – quite big with seats in it and it had a fireplace and a lower ceiling than anywhere else. It was all brown wood – oak? Something of that kind. It was all sunny and an open Times was lying across a stool. He walked up and down – sometimes with his back to me. He said he had forgotten who Mr Herridge was, but he was sure he must have liked him extremely from the tone of his (Barrie’s) letter. (I had sent it with my note.) He asked me who he was – he couldn’t remember him – couldn’t place him. I said, “I think you met him down at Lord Byngs – he was a lawyer and is now a diplomat. He gets on very well with people etc.” He said, “Oh yes, I remember in the garden. Lady Byng was very fond of gardening.“
We looked out of his window from where you can see the Thames actually bend and wind in the distance – and seven bridges crossing it. There is a big patch of green grass in front of Adelphi Terrace too. He said to me, “Do you mind if I smoke?“ and I said “No” emphatically. I sat on a little sofa under a window at the end of the room and he sat on the arm of the sofa and walked about the room smoking his pipe. He showed me Bedlam in the distance and said I was “obviously about sixteen.”He said, “Tell me something about yourself – what are you doing over here?“ I just said I was studying music. He then showed me his piano and said he was not musical in fact. I asked him – he couldn’t even play God Save the King. I said “Neither am I they tell me.”
He made conversation – about skiing – about the heat of London bringing out the trees and flowers sooner – about a girl’s school in the USA where they had asked him to give an address to 900 girls, and he said he couldn’t possibly give an address to 900 girls at once, but if he could be in a room and see each girl separately, he would give 900 speeches. “Unfortunately,“ he said, “they took me seriously and we’re actually starting to carry it out. However I escaped from that place just in time.”
He said Edinburgh was the most beautiful city in the world. He said he admired anyone who wanted an education and didn’t think it spoiled anyone. He thought girls that went were better to talk to. He said, “But a clever woman never lets on she is clever. Whenever you hear anyone say ‘That woman is clever’ you know that she is stupid. A clever woman doesn’t let you know.“
He said he had sent his sons. “They aren’t really my sons, but I educated them and brought them up“ to Eton and Oxford. He said “I never had a daughter, but if I had, I should like to keep her at home to pour out my tea for me, and I wouldn’t have this iodine all over my face if I had a woman around (except my housekeeper) to do it for me . But if she wanted to go I would send her.“ Oxford – Cambridge – Edinburgh – he didn’t seem to mind which. He said you couldn’t get a better man than his friend, Sir Arthur Quiller-Couch, and at Cambridge now they had a lot of swells.
He said university didn’t make any difference to writing – that just came out of yourself. Perhaps you wrote all wrong according to the rules – but that was your way and right for you.
I went, and he called me back just as I got to the bottom in the elevator and gave me Farewell Miss Julie and in it, then I left and waved but just as I got to the bottom again I remembered my music case and had to go up again.



2
General topic / Re: “The Lost Boys” Miniseries’ 45th Anniversary!
« on: October 12, 2023, 07:25:24 AM »
That’s a very kind thought, thank you! I am actually in Malawi, working with our charity, Anno’s Africa. About to take a dip in the vast Lake Malawi, rumoured to harbour crocodiles, so I might shortly be joining that ever-lengthening list of those who have shuffled off this mortal coil… 
3
General topic / Re: Strange but True department.
« on: August 30, 2023, 04:33:32 PM »
Yes, I discovered the link many years ago when one of the Buxtons, who ran Anglia television, asked me to write a script about Tim Birkin for – wait for it – Rowan Atkinson! I gratefully declined as I couldn’t see what the story was, nor – much as I admired him as a comedian – could I see Blackadder in the part. They went ahead anyway, and when I watched it years later, I gave a sigh of relief that it had nothing to do with me!
4
Peter Pan / Re: Peter Pan and Wendy Detailed Review
« on: May 05, 2023, 09:14:59 PM »
Many thanks for your take on this, Dani, which seems to reflect the general opinioin of crits on Rotten Toms. I remember watching the 2003 effort with my mum, who was dying in hospital. At a certain [point she said, "I've seen enough. To watch any more will only speed up my demise."  I feel much the same about this latest reboot.  Thanks for the warning!
5
Peter Pan / Re: My 1989 PP screenplay
« on: April 19, 2023, 08:32:30 PM »
Many thanks for your in-depth critical analysis Dani. Maybe I should have written a disclaimer to the effect that I’ve not re-read my PP script since I wrote it, nor did I before posting it – probably a mistake.
I’m sure most of what you say is true – but then again, maybe not. I should point out that back in the 1970s, TV programmes were here today and gone tomorrow, i.e. they had no more of a shelf life than most movies. So when I wrote my PP script, and at Coppola’s urging, I did indeed include sequences more or less lifted from the Lost Boys of 10 years earlier, which had not even been screened in the USA.
I’m sure if I re-read my PP script now I would change a good deal – which is true of the other 30/40 odd scripts sitting on a high shelf, which I am gradually dusting down and scanning for a screenplay website, but without re-reading any of them, life being rather too short.
Why not try writing your own version?
6
Peter Pan / Re: Peter Pan and Wendy Featurette
« on: April 14, 2023, 09:37:25 PM »
I really look forward to reading your review Dani - not because I'll agree with it, in fact I suspect our opinions will be poles apart, but I realise I'm a jaded old cynic and that your heart is probably closer to Barrie's than mine. It's just our cultural sensibilities that get in the way ...
7
Peter Pan / My 1989 PP screenplay
« on: April 14, 2023, 07:56:57 PM »
While awaiting Disney's new offering of PP, I've just posted my own 1989 shot at bringing PP to the silver screen, originally commissioned by Francis Coppola. Oy veh ...

For some reason this site won't allow uploads bigger than 16MB, hence the 2-parter, with time for popcorn refills in the intermission.
8
Peter Pan / Re: Peter Pan and Wendy Featurette
« on: April 14, 2023, 05:16:15 PM »
Thanks so much Dani for keeping us posted. I ain't holding my breath, but will reserve judgement for when I've seen it ...
9
JMBarrie / Barrie's early newspaper articles
« on: April 05, 2023, 02:15:14 PM »
The observant may have noticed that I've started uploading some of Barrie's early - and mostly anonymous - contributions to newspapers, principally the St James's Gazette, the Edinburgh Evening Dispatch, and a few from the Nottingham Journal. Many of these I had xeroxed at the old Colindale Newspaper Library in 1976. They have now been transferred to the British Library and some are available on the British Newspaper Archive's website. Although the Nottingham Journal appears in their index, it actually brings up the Nottingham Daily Express! Unfortunately a number of articles in the Edinburgh Evening Dispatch have been cropped vertically so that half of every line is missing.

Herbert Garland, in his 1928 bibliography, gives a useful list of Barrie's articles with dates, but it is by no means complete; Barrie himself also occasionally jots down titles and dates at the end of his notebooks. So one way and t'other there's plenty to be getting along with, and by the time I've finished uploading, hopefully the BNA will have added the Nottingham Journal as well as the British Weekly, the Scots Observer and the many others to which JMB contributed ...
10
General topic / Re: Andrew’s Napoleon Script
« on: April 27, 2022, 11:08:35 AM »
Many thanks, Dani - but having at last managed to find a way of uploading PDFs to the database, I have now added my complete script as one document, as well as The Lost Boys complete scripts. I have therefore removed the Napoleon chunks you posted on the forum as there a few glitches, and they were anyway from a slightly older version. But thanks so much for your kind labours - and for motivating me to find a way around the PDF issue ...
11
Davies Family / Re: What happened to Josephine Mitchell Innes?
« on: July 08, 2021, 09:37:09 PM »
I seem to remember her sister Norma Douglas Henry told me that she married in due course, and in due course died, but that George had been "the one".
12
Davies Family / Re: Michael’s essay “What makes a gentleman”
« on: July 08, 2021, 09:34:40 PM »
I took the extract from Hugh Macnaghten's "Fifty Years of Eton" (1924) in which he devoted a chapter to Michael. I'm afraid Macnaghten gives no more than the passage I quoted, other than introducing it by saying that "It was in this Half that writing "What makes a Gentleman" he [Michael] seemed to me to show a kinship in spirit to his guardian," i.e. Barrie.
13
Thanks for remembering ...
14
Davies Family / Re: Arthur and Alex Waugh
« on: May 21, 2021, 11:43:53 AM »
Spot on, Nicholas - and "thanks for sharing" (yuk). Most of us weirdos are more or less lonely souls, and when one finds a kindred spirit, there's the temptation to "grapple them unto thy soul with hoops of steel", perhaps the more so when they're your own progeny, or - in Barrie's case - those of a lost love.
15
General topic / Restricted access to copyright material
« on: March 19, 2021, 04:00:00 PM »
In 2005, Hutchinsons published a biography of Barrie by Lisa Chaney, Hide-And-Seek With Angels: The Life of J.M. Barrie.

The Spectator’s review included the following:  “The central episode in Barrie’s life is his relationship with the Llewelyn Davies family. This, of course, has been the subject of a terrific book by Andrew Birkin, and Lisa Chaney’s own account so conspicuously comes to life only when she is covering the same ground that she needs to justify herself by criticising what she calls Birkin’s inaccuracy.”

I wrote to Hutchinsons at the time, pointing out the extent to which she had pillaged not only my book but this website, as well as regurgitating my text and many of my observations. Although she credited a few of her quotes from the book in her extensive sources, the vast majority went uncredited. Moreover she quoted from audio clips – and reproduced photos – from this website with no credit whatsoever. As for her acknowledgements, she lumped my book in with half a dozen other books on Barrie, commenting merely that mine was “useful” but “one must be wary of the inaccuracy of his quotes from sources such as Barrie’s notebooks” – this from an author who didn’t even bother to go back to the original notebooks herself but merely quoted my extracts (including ellipses where I’d left words out) without ever once citing any inaccuracies!

I received a fulsome apology from Hutchinsons at the time, assuring me that the numerous quotes I listed would be cited in her End Notes in all future editions, and that an "erratum slip" would be inserted in all hardback first editions of the book, reading:
 
"The author acknowledges her use in Hide-and-Seek with Angels of Andrew Birkin's J M Barrie and the Lost Boys (Yale University Press, 2003) and of his website, jmbarrie.co.uk."
 
Lisa Chaney’s book is now available on Kindle (as is Denis Mackail’s and mine). It appears to be a scan of her first edition, without any acknowledgement of the material taken from this website, nor corrections, nor the text of the erratum slip, nor any further citations in her End Notes. Nor, indeed, does it correct any of the clumsy mistakes I pointed out to Hutchinson’s in 2005, e.g. the last line of her book - "Nico died in 1986" - when in fact he died in 1980. In short, the Kindle version is without any of the corrections I was assured would be made to all future editions. I wrote to Hutchinsons some weeks ago, who politely passed the buck on to Chaney’s new publishers, Arrow Books. Thus far I have not heard back from them.

When I first started this website in 1998, I was well aware that writers might want to make use of the large amount of original source material in the database – indeed I hoped as much – but I also asked that they would give credit to this website as their source. Latterly, Piers Dudgeon has written two books that also draw extensively on material that can only be found on this site, but at least he says as much in his Introduction and Acknowledgements, although he too fails to cite it as the source for individual quotes within the main text in the vast majority of instances.

For this reason we are suspending much of the original source material contained in the database that is still in copyright, in particular, Peter’s Morgue, and Nico’s correspondence. Should anyone wish access to this material, they should make a specific request to Dear Brutus or myself.

I'm truly sorry to have to do this, but it seems that certain professional writers are not above unscrupulous behaviour - which is a pity: all we ever asked for was acknowledgement.

====

Update: I've only just laid my hands on the paperback version of Chaney's biography, and indeed all the corrections/citations appear to have been done, so my only gripe is with the Kindle version ...

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 29